Skip to main content

Illusion of Gaia review

 Illusion of Gaia is many things. The short version is that it's a blend of a puzzle game and an RPG, where you run through various landmarks of the world in search of six macguffins. The long version is....well, let's just say this is a game with layers upon layers.

But I didn't write this to describe the game, but rather to deliver my judgement on it. So, let me get this out of the way: it is, in simple terms, a Good Game, with certain really big caveats. Chief among them is the inconsistent quality of dungeons, where some dungeons are decently imaginative while others rely on moon logic or excessive backtracking, and make you want to tear your hair out. There is exactly one Great level in this game, the Sky Gardens, while Mu and Mt. Temple are aggravatingly padded out dungeons, not helped in the slightest by their selection of enemies. 

So what makes it Good, then? Well, the game does try its hand at a rather intriguing premise. It genuinely captures the spirit of adventuring across a world filled with secrets and legends of long gone civilizations, legends that hold true within the game's universe, of course. While the game's narrative efforts are held back by the rather spotty translation, and while the story is flawed at multiple levels, it has a way with giving vibes that make it come off as sincere, heartfelt and charming.

Gameplay wise, the game provides a decent set of tools for both mass murder and puzzle solving. In fact, many of the tools are built for both purposes, and fulfil them adequately. At its best, the game features creative usage of them to get past obstacles or navigate spaces in interesting ways. It must be noted, however, that some of them, particularly the protagonist boy's powers, tend to suffer from standard SNES jank, in that they're a bit too stiff to be reliably performed in situations where they would theoretically be useful, and thus end up being used as keys more than actual combat moves.

Speaking of combat, Illusion has real time grid based combat, and it's...well, it's fine. There are some monsters that are built to be really obnoxious, and sometimes the game has the protagonist feel really underpowered, especially in its last few dungeons. There are two other characters the protagonist can transform into who are built better for combat, and their presence does alleviate some of its problems. Unfortunately, they aren't reliably available, being accessible only at certain save points, and a lot of the puzzle solving moves are given solely to the protagonist, which often forces a switch back to him. I get the idea, and it's conceptually cool, but it didn't pan out all too well.

All of this leads to my biggest complaint - the game designs scenarios where you are expected to fight foes way out of your league. This isn't impossible, of course, and the aforementioned characters do even out the odds, but it largely doesn't feel good, which is kind of a big issue, considering how much combat this game makes you participate in. I feel like the game definitely indulged a bit too much in its combat scenarios, and paring some of them down for a bigger focus on the puzzles would have made for a far better game.

As it stands, Illusion of Gaia feels like a frustratingly imperfect game, one that came so close and yet fell so far. It has enough charm to endear, yet not enough to paper over all of its shortcomings. Try it if you like puzzle RPGs, but be prepared for some seriously rough edges, and don't be afraid to consult a guide if you get stuck - odds are, you're missing clues due to either bad translation, or straight up moon logic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

About Me

  I am Dev Jyoti Chand, a man of many interests. Chiefly, I like playing video games, specifically, strategy 4xes, strategy RPGs, and adventure games. My favorite games are Master of Magic, Tactics Ogre, specifically the SNES/PS1 version, and Quintessence - The Blighted Venom. I also am very interested in learning about history, especially ancient and medieval history, and am ever curious to learn more about the world. This blog is mostly a grab bag of subjects I felt strongly enough about to dedicate words upon words. Most notable among them are a series of challenge runs of the Star Ocean 2 remake, and a long form commentary on To the Moon. I am not especially proud of the latter, but I think it has some personal value as my first serious attempt at writing a literary analysis, and perhaps you might get some enjoyment out of it. I am ever eager to talk about my interests, and am very accepting of feedback, as long as it is given in good faith. If you wish to contact me, you may...

Caster of Magic For Windows School Evaluations: Sorcery

 Some of you might remember that I had started evaluating the magic schools in this game to figure out their strengths and weaknesses. I picked Nature as that was a fairly straightforward school. The rest...aren't quite so clear cut, but they still have themes they try to convey via their design. Anyway, it's now time for.... SORCERY Sorcery loosely represents the forces of wind, water and most importantly, magic itself. Its summons have great control over water, and it manipulates wind to make units fly and even become swift transports themselves, but by far their most impactful spells are magical tricks that undermine the "rules" of battle. As such, Sorcery very much is the realm of trickery...and it kind of has to be, as it has little power backing it up. When they work, they work very well, netting it amazing rewards and letting it crush its foes with ease. But when they don't , it is in deep trouble. Now, it does have some nifty logistical spells too, and th...

Caster of Magic for Windows School Evaluations: Nature

 Recently, Hadriex made a video  covering combinations of two magic schools in Caster of Magic for Windows(henceforth called Caster of Magic 2, or CoM 2 in short). While it was a good effort, I feel like he didn't go into as much depth as I would've liked: combining schools of magic is actually a very complex and nuanced decision, especially when deciding how many books to use from each school. The choice of retorts also complicates this, as they provide a very significant boost to the early and mid game of several wizards, if picked correctly. And, like most strategy games, the early and middle portions are some of the most significant - if your wizard takes off early and stays strong through the middle, they get a lot more territory and power, which later leads to them mobilizing strong armies more effectively. So, I've decided to take a look at the subject myself. To do this, I've decided to first look at the strengths and weaknesses of each school accurately, before...